Canine V. Richards

Here is a great  post: Right on Lisa!

By Lisa Richards

According to liberal lunatic and Obama Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein, my dog should have the right to file a lawsuit against me if he so desires. For what; punishing the spoiled, catered-to brat by forcing him to watch Keith Olberman and Anderson Cooper when he does naughty-naughty in the house?

The thought would be laughable if it was not true, but Sunstein literally wants animals to have lawsuit rights against human beings. Sunstein wants pets to sue humans if the adorable fur balls feel we humans have been unfair to them: “Representatives of animals should be able to bring private suits to ensure that anticruelty and related laws are actually enforced. Of course, any animals would be represented by human beings…”

Well thank God for that. I would hate to think trial lawyers might lose money needed to pay off their mistresses.

There already are laws against animal abuse, but that is not what Sunstein is concerned with. He does not want us Americans hunting, wearing, or eating Animals. No does he want us cooping up our livestock, which would die if we left them to the wilds.

Sunstein further solidified his insanity by claiming that “…just like any other litigant who lacks ordinary competence; for example, the interests of children are protected by prosecutors and also by trustees and guardians in private litigation brought on by the children’s …”

Animals will, if Cass has his way, receive the same rights as children. In which case, animals would have to be aborted up to late term, just prior to birth. If Sunstein wants animals to have the same rights as children, he must allow animals identical laws: become victims of pedophiles, set free by liberal activist judges and the Supreme Court that now protects pedophiles from cruel accusations.

To make matters crazier, Sunstein declared “If getting rid of the idea that animals are property is helpful in reducing suffering, then we should get rid of the idea that animals are property.”

Hey, why not, liberals did that for babies and look how many of those 50 million children discovered cures for diseases and went on to save animals from abuse. But hey, it left a lot less children to be the victims of “property” by parents.

Sunstein is just one of Obama’s czars and quite possibly the craziest. When lunatics make Van Jones appear sane, something is very wrong. Sunstein is not lying about his intentions either. He truly believes Fido and Fluffy should sue their owners for cruelty.

I take offense. I should have the right to sue my five month-old Rottweiler for the fact he ate my living room, not to mention he ate the antique Persian rug that once graced the entrance hall, peed my dining room rug and chewed the legs on the antique Chippendale table, and turned my English gardens into a reenactment of the London Blitz. Sorry Cass darling, but I contest. My dog lives better than most people, including me, who, now lives in a sty in desperate need of reupholstering.

According to Republican spokesman Kevin McLaughlin, “Texas Senator John Cornyn finds numerous aspects of Mr. Sunstein’s record troubling, specifically the fact that he wants to establish legal ‘rights’ for livestock, wildlife and pets, which would enable animals to file lawsuits in American courts.”

Does that include the wild snakes in my gardens I beat to death with a giant shovel this spring when cleaning out the piles of leaves? I consider whacking Satan quite necessary to my numerous rights as a woman.

On the subject of rights, the California Central Valley farmers deserve rights to grow food, but have had their farming rights destroyed by environmental nuts like Sunstein for the sake of a fish considered more important than humans in need of food.

I say the farmers of California exercise their Second Amendment rights and blow those fish out of the water the farmers are not allowed access to.

Sunstein is not only serious; he is attempting to pass legislation that would provide pets, livestock, and wildlife with the resources to take us Americans for everything we have—including them. Foxnews.com reported: “Sunstein has spoken stridently in favor of allowing people the right to bring suit on behalf of animals in animal cruelty cases and to restrict what he calls the more horrific practices associated with industrial breeding and processing
of animals for food.”

It is offensive for people like me to eat animals, it is unforgivable if an animal is aborted from its mother’s womb, it is however not odious, or aggressive, in any way, if women abort human children.

It should be noted that Cass Sunstein attended the esteemed Harvard School of Law at Harvard University. Sunstein gave a speech at Harvard, promoting and encouraging banning animal testing for cosmetics, outlawing hunting in America, because it kills innocent animals, and asked all Americans to abstain from eating meat.

Does that include banning animals from hunting each other? Sorry, but I refuse to prevent my cats from hunting and killing mice. And the spoiled dog gets ground beef with his steamed rice.

If liberals had brains, which they don’t since liberals are anal retentive and sit on their thoughts, they would understand animals cannot survive if hunters do not keep wildlife population controlled: too many animals in the wild mean lack of food. That is cruelty.

And many Americans thought Sarah Palin was too inexperienced and dumb because she has five children and hunts. Apparently all it takes to be considered intellectual in this nation is political advocacy for placing animals on the witness stand.

What is pathetic is the fact Sunstein is regarded as worthy to serve in the White House. Even more wretched is many Americans agree with Sunstein’s abnormal defense of animals, yet scream in outrage if women refuse to have abortions to murder as many unborn children as possible. Without aborting humans, animals do not have room to roam the allegedly over-crowded planet.

Welcome to the land of Obama Czars and Smart Cars.

This is the reason many Americans in all parties are turning out at Tea Party Rallies: Americans are sick and tired of lunatics running this nation that is supposed to be governed by the people, who have more sense than those with legislative titles wanting animals to rule.

Even Orwell can’t top this.

Lisa Richards Copyright © September 14, 2009 All Rights Reserved
www.lisa-richards.com

One Response to “Canine V. Richards”

  1. Posts about Texas Tea Parties as of September 15, 2009 | Texas Tea Parties Says:

    [...] set in their beliefs, they are not open to other opinions. They refuse hearing  other opinions. Canine V. Richards – conservativecentral.us 09/14/2009 Here is a great  post: Right on Lisa! By Lisa Richards [...]